CLEARWATER — The Church of Scientology, defending itself against a $35,000 refund claim, told a Pinellas judge Friday that the courts cannot meddle in its religious affairs.
- Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.
- Public Discussion (111)
Citing the First Amendment as it has in numerous court cases, the church told Pinellas-Pasco Circuit Judge John A. Schaefer that two former parishioners from Seattle must submit to an internal Scientology arbitration procedure to get any money back.
Bert Schippers and Lynne Hoverson, longtime Scientologists who left the church in 2009, sued two of the church's Clearwater entities in November after they requested their money back and didn't receive it.
As is common in Scientology, Schippers left the money "on account" with the church to pay later for spiritual counseling. But he never used it.
- 14 votes
Religious law overriding American law. Isn't this exactly what the RWNJs are worried about with Sharia law? How many of them do you think will boycott Tom Cruise movies in protest?
- 37 votes
Typical religious clap trap, no different than quoting verse to prove a point. In short, the religious community gets to skip paying taxes, now they think they can just steal from people without reprisal, typical.
- 23 votes
It isnt that they hate all Tom Cruise's or that they deny that some are good Tom Cruise's, they just think it is dangerous to show him in a positive light in a movie. What will our kids think? they might stop to talk to a tom cruise or befriend one of our children and we cant have that. It has nothing to do with Tom Cruisism, I have one as a good friend, he comes does my yard once a month.
- 3 votes
Its funny how they claim that the judge can't interfere here but wants one to for a confidentiality agreement.
And I thought the story said the money was for services that were never rendered not donations.
- 15 votes
The church argues the couple first must submit to "binding religious arbitration" as laid out in a standard church contract Schippers signed before giving the money. The contract calls for a panel of three Scientologists in good standing to decide what would be fair.
Obviously, the couple chooses not to honor the business contract it signed with the church. And if the church wants to enforce its business contract.....
Wait a minute. Business contract? The church is running a business? And it wants to confiscate moneys it holds in escrow?
After the conclusion of this trial, it's time for the IRS to subpoena the Church's "business records" for the last 60 years, since their founding, and generate a tax bill on all prophets (sorry for the pun). Is there a statute of limitations on fraud?
- 24 votes
You cannot commit fraud and hide it under a religious cloak.
- 15 votes
Nick46,
You can when the religious loonies have control of your political and judicial system.
- 8 votes
sky dog - All churches that are exempt from taxes are considered unincorporated legal entities. It's an interesting thing to read up on how all that works.
- 1 vote
The church argues the couple first must submit to "binding religious arbitration" as laid out in a standard church contract Schippers signed before giving the money. The contract calls for a panel of three Scientologists in good standing to decide what would be fair.
First a court has to determine whether the contract is valid or not. All contracts must conform to US contract law. If not it is not valid.
- 4 votes
You cannot commit fraud and hide it under a religious cloak.
How long have you been in 'mericuh? It happens all the time, lmao.
- 8 votes
This judge needs to slap this cult down, and apply American law, plain and simple. There is no scientology law in a american court, just what is by the secular law, and the constitution. It's time for these religious nutbags to suck it up, and abide by the law if they want to remain in this country, they could always move to france if they wanted *snicker*
- 6 votes
boycott Tom Cruise movies in protest?
I would boycott his movies just for the hell of it.
- 6 votes
I would boycott his movies just for the hell of it.
I am not saying that is a bad thing. But, I have to admit that I am a bit Tom-curious, and on occasion watch a Tom Cruise movie. But, truth be told, I often feel dirty afterwards.
- 2 votes
He's not a great actor. He just has his religion backing him up and has to have alot of special effects. Gone are the days when he could carry a movie based purely on his acting skill along. Now he needs gobs of money to buy gobs of props and computer effects.
I quit watching tom cruise movies after I found out about the whole scientology cult. Same reason I don't watch anything by will smith and his family either.
- 6 votes
He's not a great actor
Oh I disagree, he's a great actor alright, look how many people think he's a great person. I personally think he is a self centered @!$%# who uses women the way most people use toilet paper, but that is just my opinon.
- 3 votes
Its not like this 'church' hasn't made it clear from the beginning that they are only interested in money. If someone is foolish enough to give them any, they deserve what they get.
- 5 votes
Just my opinion: Scientology has always been more of a business than a religion.
- 6 votes
This says it all…
"The declaration that religious faith shall be unpunished does not give immunity to criminal acts dictated by religious error." --Thomas Jefferson to James Madison, 1788.
- 8 votes
He argued that Schippers would have his money back by now if he had completed that process,
If they had any intention of paying them back they would have by now. I have no doubt that the church would gladly pay $100,000 in legal fees just to not pay these people their money back.
- 6 votes
And the judge better listen, or Lord Xenu will deal with him!
- 7 votes
Its funny how they claim that the judge can't interfere here but wants one to for a confidentiality agreement.
Funnier yet is he is seeking a judgement in a court he does not recognize!
- 4 votes
You cannot commit fraud and hide it under a religious cloak.
Sure you can if the cloak is called "the Vatican".
- 7 votes
Let's be clear, Scientology is not a regligion. An organized system of belief, maybe, but that's as far as it goes. That L.Ron Hubbard in a flight of fantasy called it a "religion" and used the term "church" makes it no more, or less, a religion than the Pastafarian Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster.
Using this news link, as some have done here, to launch criticism of religion in general (even if justified) is one toke over the line.
- 2 votes
Okay, first we have this:
Church lawyer F. Wallace Pope Jr. of Clearwater said none of that matters. Numerous courts have held that the First Amendment shields religions from judicial intrusion. To rule on the merits of the contract, Schaefer would have to entangle himself in religious issues, Pope said.
He argued: "Only Scientology law applies."
And then we have this:
In contrast to the church's stance Friday in Pinellas, it is asking a Texas court to get involved in an internal matter there. It wants the court to force a former church executive to abide by a confidentiality agreement she signed with the church in 2007.
So which is it?
On the first I would say the first amendment does NOT say that the courts may not become involved where merit says they should. It does say that government may not write laws supporting any particular religion or banning any particular religion.
On the second, contracts are a matter of secular law. If their contract is good enough in one case to take to a court of law, then all of their contracts are.
As for Tom, I don't think he's a very good actor. He seems to only have two expressions, confused and constipated. *chuckles*
- 3 votes
Scientology is as much of a religion as any. And all are organized systems of belief based on faith. You are just obfuscating inspite of starting off saying "Lets be clear."
Funny how Christians say things like Scientology are not religions and clam atheism is one.
- 3 votes
Scientology is a faith based on relieving others of as much money as possible. Sort of like Bernie Madoff.
- 3 votes
Scientology is proving a truism about ALL religion, along with the current pissing and moaning of catholics - religious institutions believe they should be ABOVE the law and outside it.
Well, guess what, alot of us think that your claims of being "special" because you talk for some sort of flying spaghetti monster are just a load of crap that we don't even want to LISTEN TO, as it is just a cheap way of evading taxes and lawful conduct, and YOU ARE subject to the SAME LAWS as all of the rest of us, flying spaghetti monster or not.
- 3 votes
y'all don't be makin' FUN of FSM, yah hear? Lest FSM smite you with a noodley appendage
- 4 votes
Scientology is as much of a religion as any.
Daniel (#1.27) You best take a little time to look up some general conditions that describe and circumscribe religion. You are just way out in right field on this.
Like other comments here, this seems to be the thin edge of the wedge for criticism of religion in general and faith in particular.
I carry no brief for religion; I am not a person of faith or follower of any doctrine, but I keep finding myself asking the same questions of the aggressively anti-religious folks: why do they want too badly to bring the faithful to heel? Why not just leave it alone, why attack those who do believe and practice their faith? What is it, exactly, that annoys you (again, the collective you) so much about religion?
I don't think it is religion so much as "organized religion" that folks have such a huge problem with. As far as people in general, its not so much the average individuals who have a religious faith as it is the fundamentalists that drive folks batty.
Its not anti religion but anti quit being a effin' control freak jerk thing.
- 3 votes
why attack those who do believe and practice their faith?
(no disrespect intended, buuut) Are you blind? Or have you not been paying attention for the last 40 years? If you are not xtian, you are not American in their view. The concept of a Xtian America is their ideal, even though it flies in the face of everything the Founding Fathers stood for.
I'll have no problem with xtians, the day they stop having a problem with me. Until then, I will pick nits, and I will stand with logic and reason against any who seek to use their 'faith' to rule me and mine.
I NEVER speak against Jews, nor Muslims, nor Buddhists, nor Sikhs, etc. I have no reason to, they are respectful and polite. We agree to disagree, and all is well. But xtians?They need to proselytize, indeed they feel obligated to do so, in fact they are OFFENDED by your being OFFENDED at their proselytization, as if they have a right to rub your nose in their religion, no matter how many times you politely say, "No, thank you."
I've given up on polite, they don't get it, and after a few decades of their callous disregard for my (and others') feelings, I've stopped turning the other cheek. Juvenile? probably, but I've taken as much as I can stand, and I can't stand it no more.
- 3 votes
Scientology, the Comic Sans of Religion.
- 14 votes
Scientology, the Comic Sans of Religion.
Have you seen any of these mega-churches or pictures of the Vatican?
The only difference between a religion and a cult that I can tell is a religion has more political backing.
- 8 votes
correct, the abrahamic religions were just dangerous cults until they got govnt backing, then they became dangerous "religions"
- 2 votes
Scientology is not a religion; it's a for-profit cult.
- 24 votes
All religions should be sued into extinction based upon fraud laws.
Continually promising a "product" for donations, love gifts, seeds of prosperity and getting nothing in return.
Just another in a long line of BS trump cards and exceptions afforded delusional spirituality.
- 23 votes
Well said, bluearcher. Imagine any other type of service provider asking for large sums of money based on nebulous promises to be delivered after you die.
"XYZ Chiropractic Care - come to us twice a week for life and we promise you'll have no more back pain after you're dead!"
- 21 votes
cult versus religion = acceptance.
Like it or not it is a religion according to our laws
But that is only due to how foolish religion is, you can properly define something that is non falsifiable and lives in the infinite world of the unknown.
How are you going to make a law to keep the Scientology out and the Catholics in?
There is no verbiage in existence that can separate religion from bull@!$%#.
You can only be specific. You can only say "this is acceptable bull@!$%# and so I will let it be called a religion" versus "this here is unacceptable bull@!$%# and I will call it a cult or just plain bull@!$%#"
- 6 votes
All religions should be sued into extinction based upon fraud laws.
These kind of statements are what make some atheists just as bad as religious bigots. To applaud this mindset and criticize religious attacks on atheism is hypocrisy.
Continually promising a "product" for donations, love gifts, seeds of prosperity and getting nothing in return
Who promises what? The churches that I support don't claim to have the power to promise anything. The churches that I support do collect donations to help the needy, if you are expecting something in return for a donation then you are missing the point.
Just another in a long line of BS trump cards and exceptions afforded delusional atheism.
- 6 votes
There is no verbiage in existence that can separate religion from bull@!$%#.
Here is a bit of verbiage that I gathered a couple of years ago from a source that I don't remember which sheds some light on the cult of Christianity:
Christianity is the belief that a cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his own father can make you live forever if you symbolically eat his flesh and telepathically tell him you accept him as your master, so he can remove an evil force from your soul that is present in humanity because a rib-woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree.
Just as crazy of a place to get laws as Scientology, I would say.
- 12 votes
Greatest post evar! I wish I could vote it up one million times.
My wife made my children go to church with her this past Sunday and apprently my youngest would yell out that jesus and god aren't real everytime someone would say praise jesus, etc. She's not happy with me and planning on forcing all four children to go church with her. I told her she shouldn't be forcing her ideas on the children but she thinks it's ok. I need to show her that post. Thank you for that Rob!
- 4 votes
I am with you ZenFreedom, my wife is Catholic and has been bringing my boy and girl to church since they were born. I have always told them, though, there is no god. Funny thing is, they are still not old enough to be told there is no Santa Claus.
- 1 vote
So you both are trying to instill your belief system into the kids, it sounds like they are being used in some kind of game.
- 2 votes
I don't tell my children about religion unless they ask me specific questions. My religion is Buddhism. The only reason my children know my views on x-tianity is because my wife is always trying to make me go to church, but I refuse. I play no games with my children. I'm just not going to lead them to the brainwasher. When they're ready to choose a religion they are more than welcome to go forth and do that. Until that time, I don't want them being brainwahsed into x-tianity. I don't make them go to the path of Buddhism or any other religion. Religion is a personal coping mechanism and shouldn't be forced on anyone. My wife just happens to be very superstitious.
- 6 votes
So you both are trying to instill your belief system into the kids, it sounds like they are being used in some kind of game.
What the @!$%# are you talking about? I also tell my kids to eat their vegetables. I am their dad. I am supposed to tell them things and what I believe and why. Now, rejecting them if they do not believe the same things as I do would be a different story.
- 4 votes
I don't tell my children about religion unless they ask me specific questions.
Actually I was talking to Rob. That's fine that you are open to let them decide when they want to one way or another. If you turn them against Christianity before they have a chance to learn about it I don't see where that is not leading them to a belief that you want them to have.
- 3 votes
I'm not turning them against anything, but let's face it, x-tianity isn't where it is in the world today because people just suddenly started believing. It spread through violence and coercion. If it could co-exist peacefully with other religions then there would be more choices of religion to be had in the world today.
- 5 votes
Red hat and Zen - so it's ok for YOU to tell your kids your "truth" but it's not ok for your wife to tell your kids her "truth". Oh yeah, I can see these two marriages headed for divorce court.
- 1 vote
Oh yeah, I can see these two marriages headed for divorce court.
Excuse me, but who the f are you? lmao.
I don't tell my kids anything about religion. If they ask me about my religion I tell them what they specifically ask for. My kids are 5, 7, 11, and 15. They don't ask me questions about my religion because I don't bring it up. My wife and I have been together for almost 19 years now. If we were going to divorce over something as stupid as religion it would have happened a long time ago. It pays to ask questions and get some background before making yourself look like an ass.
- 6 votes
Scientology is not a religion; it's a for-profit cult.
It's all a bunch of made up crap to hide behind. The law should not allow this, and all so called religions need to be taxed as businesses, well, taxed as robberies...
- 2 votes
Mom90210, who the @!$%# said, beside you, said that it was not all right for my wife to tell the kids what she believes? My wife and I get along because we are adults who can handle each others different viewpoints and opinions. If you cannot see that, you should be worried about yourself.
- 4 votes
I'll chalk it up to you having more tact than other people, Sammy :)
- 3 votes
not that it matters to me - but - what DO they do with all their money?
- 1 vote
Here is a bit of verbiage that I gathered a couple of years ago from a source that I don't remember which sheds some light on the cult of Christianity:
Christianity is the belief that a cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his own father can make you live forever if you symbolically eat his flesh and telepathically tell him you accept him as your master, so he can remove an evil force from your soul that is present in humanity because a
rat (#3.6). First of all, your ignorance is showing through; by any definition I know, Christianity (like Hinduism, Islam, Judiasm etc) cannot be a "cult."
That aside, you feel the need to post this for what reason? This is offensive to every Christian who reads it, every non-christian person of faith. In fact, it's offensive to me, personally, and I am neither religious nor faithful.
Statements like this are cheap and common, vituperation with the apparent intent of hurting and such things read as the mewling of a scared child. You ought to be ashamed.
the main difference between a religion and a cult are:
large number of members
political power
social acceptance
if you have all of these things you are a religion, if not you are a cult.
- 2 votes
Church Lawyer Tells Judge: 'Only Scientology Law Applies'
In contrast to the church's stance Friday in Pinellas, it is asking a Texas court to get involved in an internal matter there. It wants the court to force a former church executive to abide by a confidentiality agreement she signed with the church in 2007.
Clowns and snake oil salesmen...
- 12 votes
Wow, sorry churchiologist guys in Florida -- when you make a contract with someone, then it's an action covered under CONTRACT LAW. See peppercorns.
- 11 votes
I have to agree go thruthe process then sue them. since it requires going back to the church then you maight be able to add punitive and emotional damges.
The next big question, verbal contracts. Most of the churches I attended don't require written contracts but are full of verbal contracts, You accept Jesus, you eat his flesh and drink his blood, could churches claim you have to go thru an arbitration process based on this before using the legal system?
An organization that makes you give lots of money sign an actual contract and promises an intangible return (if you paid enough). Yup, sounds like a scam to me...Scientology is not a true religion, just an front for a rip-off group.
Scientology was founded by L Ron Hubbard - to win a bet. He is also known for the quote "If you want to be a millionaire, start a church." He also invented a machine that (according to him) "proved" that tomatoes scream in pain when sliced.
OK, Now form an opinion about the purity of Scientology...
- 13 votes
how darest thou insult Saint Ron?? (do I really need to indicate sarcasm?)
- 1 vote
When I worked in Downtown Clearwater on Fort Harrison I would see the little brown shirts going from class to class oblivious to everything around them. They never would say geood morning or excuse me as they rushed past you or even acknowledge your existance. A couple from out of town were bicycling by the Hotel and stopped by the side entrance to ask for directions. They were promptly surrounded by security guards and asked to leave...bewildered they rode on..what a nice way to treat our tourists...
- 4 votes
As per the contract the parties must use pre-selected members to act as "arbitrators." hmmm.
Hate to point out the obvious but members of the cult acting as arbitrators is like handing the keys to the hen house over to the fox and telling the fox to lock up when he is done.
- 6 votes
This religious group is a freaking scam just like the majority of them..
- 7 votes
This group is a scam with no religious affiliation about it. It is a holding company for a vast real estate empire that maintains itself without taxation. Been there...seen it!
- 4 votes
IF We Taxed Religions / so called religions like we are taxed on our property and payroll.. Then We would see the collapse of many of these so-called religious groups... and from where I am sitting.. that's for the better.
- 7 votes
Fantastic... I pay almost $19.00 a thousand on my property tax.. Do they pay for everything that a city and town provides.. like water, sewer, schools, and the property that they own?
- 4 votes
When they are building and/or not using their property (legally-occupancy permit) for the tax exempt purpose.
- 1 vote
This religious group is a freaking scam just like
the majorityALL of them
FTFY
Just because it is slightly older, and more common, makes it no less of a scam.
- 3 votes
this is why churches need to be taxes same as everyone else. taxed for their income(sales tax, I mean their pretty much selling tickets to heaven), preacher's income, prop. taxes, auto taxes. The whole shabang.
- 4 votes
I say tax them too, but they get all the same deductions that everyone else does. Can you imagine their charitible contributions deduction? I would say that they will probably get most of their taxes written off. The really small churches would probably hurt the most as their tithes would be much smaller maybe just enough to keep the building taken care of.
- 1 vote
Really it stands to reason that once again religious proponents have it turned as usual half-assed and backward. It's (American Taliban) religious types with no know-how or business in meddling into legalalities. These pushy uneducated bible thumpers don't know any more about the law (other than their attempts at manipulation of it) than they do about science, the world, people, fair weather, politics, or otherwise.
- 2 votes
Luckily these guys are white or there would be some kind of Obama/Sharia law tie-in here.
- 2 votes
I am definitely missing the gravy train on this one; guess I need to start me a religion, begin soliciting donations in exchange for false hopes and empty promises. And start a war, must not forget to kill those who won't believe in me.
- 4 votes
Makes one wonder if somethings in their water down there. More leftover sludge from BP that just doesn't mix?
- 1 vote
a trip into clearwater on ft. harrison dr. where this cult is headquartered is something. the city has bent over for this bunch way too many times at the expense of the taxpayers. just because someone puts the word church in their name should not give them special status. hell, i think i'll call myself the first and last church of baddestbob in an effort to avoid taxes and to be able to argue for special treatment in the courts should i ever be sued.
- 3 votes
The contract Schippers signed — the same one signed by all Scientologists before taking services
First off when do you need a Signed contract to have God on your side? and if you did sign a contract for your religion, well dumb ass your the one who signed it, too bad for you. Learn your lesson and move on.
- 2 votes
I thought scientologists worshipped an alien...
What religion doesn't?
- 3 votes
I thought scientologists worshipped an alien...
An Alien and or someone who is up above the clouds what's the differents? Still No hard facts to back any of it up.
- 3 votes
they are so screwed up they probably worship an ALLEN WRENCH...er alien wench
- 1 vote
Just start a church called " The First Almighty Dollar" at least that way one would be sure of what one was worshiping and why it wants your money
- 4 votes
First of all, let me state that I am an atheist. It sounds to me as though the Scientologists are right, that a contract exists, and that the plaintiff has to jump through the proper hoops if he wants his money back. More fool him to begin with. What sort of idiot would put money on deposit with a church expecting to get it back once they "see the light"?
- 1 vote
So does this mean I can get my money back from the any church or religion that I gave as long as I claim I no longer believe?
- 1 vote
Wow, ksilver, this could be great! Contribute much more than you can afford, get the tax breaks, and then the following year demand your money back! If my mother (the shopper from hell) ever hears about this, she'll be in business!
- 1 vote
Thank God we don't have Sharia Law in this country! I was starting to get worried there for a minute /s
- 3 votes
If we did can I still get my money back??????????????????????? This is about money.
Farengi first rule of acquisition - ONCE YOU HAVE THEIR MONEY NEVER GIVE IT BACK!
I think the Scientoligists are right. Once you make a donation it can not be returned. That would cause many problems for religious, political, charitable and social justice groups. Changing the law and court precidents for these clowns with their buyers remorse is a bad idea.
These ex-scientoligists agreed to the terms and believed them reasonable when they signed up. The scientolists didn't trick them, do or require anything different then they signed up for.
Yes, I think they are idiots and suckers for pledging their fortunes to a wacky religious group. That is the freedom you get in America. The Scientolists belief system is a bit fantastic with the aliens and the volcanos. They sure seem to know about money. They must be doing something right as cults and religions go. Few others get the rich and influental to drink the Koolaid, lace up the Nike's and start writing checks.
- 2 votes
Actually they are not "donations" they are "fees" for services. If services are not rendered then fees are not applied. These folks did not ask for or receive any services the fees were reserved for. They should get their money back.
Kind of like any other service industry. If services are not rendered then fees cannot be collected.
- 3 votes
Actually they are not "donations" they are "fees" for services.
Twenty years ago me and a gay buddy started a cult. It was a great deal. We did drugs and prayed. Our acyolates gave it up to the ministers. Better still, they paid us for it. They were all people that left their home town. They had no one watching their back.
- 1 vote
I know an ex-Scientologist that did get their money back. If you didn't receive the auditing or training you paid for, you can do it.
That also requires total disconnection from them unless you restore the money and do some sort of restitution. A rather heavy hardsell goes with trying to keep someone from doing that. I kind of got the image of going to one of those timeshare sales pitches to get the microwave or the TV if you can endure the sales pitch, you're good.
- 1 vote
Since when are religions exempt from Government laws. Mayby on a planet in a galaxy far far away a long long time ago but not on earth and not now.
- 1 vote
This is somewhat different than donating to the Catholic church because a Scientology "donation" is usually for specific training and services.
If you actually do the training and services, I'd have to agree you shouldn't get your money back unless you can make a good case the training and services were sub-par and can document it. If you never received them, really like any other thing you pay money for, you can get your money back.
I have no involvement with Scientology but I know someone who did and "disconnected" and got some of their money back.
- 1 vote
Doesn't the Bible say............"Render to Caesar the things that Caesars and to God the things that are God's"? This organization has set itself up as a Demigod and expects that like the Image of Nebuchadnezzar, everyone will fall down and worship it.
Remember, like the Tower of Babel, it will fall and crumble in the faces of those who build it.
- 2 votes
I don't know about that 'crumbling' part. A fool and his money comes to mind here.
- 2 votes
What is wrong with some of you people? How can you hate so deeply, so completely (in fact, dare I say so faithfully), that you want to tear down the faith and practice of so many other people and strip away something that may well be a comfort to them? Another person's faith doesn't hurt you as a non-believer, and it may very well help him or her, and yet you attack. Why?
It's not for me to judge this perverse process, but if I had to guess based on a long life and observation, I'd say such anger is born out of deep, gut churning fear. But of all the things to be afraid of, why choose to be most afraid of the faith, or religion, of others?
It just makes no sense.
Regardless of what anyone else heard about Scientology and I find a lot wrong with it (Xenu? Really?) I'd have to say based on my friend's experience, if you pay money for a Scientology service or training and you're deeply dissatisfied with it or never used it, you can get your money back. I have no idea how you'd ever get your money back if you made a donation to the Catholic church or Pat Robertson's church on wheels or something like that. Scientology's pretty hard sell but they're upright on making sure someone gets a good service they get "donations" for.
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |



